top of page

Substance Over Form

The idea of “Substance over Form” suggests that rather than relying exclusively on a corporation’s legal structure, the capture and recording of financial transactions should consider the economic substance of the business.

The Finance lease agreement, in which the lessee does not legally own the leased item but is portrayed as an asset for the business since it is utilized to generate revenue for the enterprise, is a classic example used to illustrate this notion.

A transaction is an example of an occurrence that might change a corporate entity’s financial situation. The majority of the time, a contract between a buyer and a seller created assets for one party and/or a liability for the other party. Business transactions include things like purchasing raw materials, selling inventories, entering into contracts and obtaining a bank loan.

Example of Substance over form

Substance = Realism (true value)

Form = Value in documents (legal value/form)

This concept believes that accountant should value the transaction at substance. Let’s understands the concept with the following example.

You found out during an audit at Michael Sdn Bhd that the company paid RM 2,000 to TT Sdn Bhd for RM 1,000 sqf land. You become aware of how a RM 1,000 plot have been acquired for RM 2000 in this way.

So, you meet with the company’s management and look over any supporting documentation. You were taken back by the RM 2,000 agreed-upon selling deed. It was then uncovered that Michael Sdn Bhd had committed to giving a certain production method (internally created) in exchange for RM 2,000 and this. However, the agreement made no mention of it. The site therefore had a RM 20,000 market value, and a scale document was created for RM 2,000 instead.

In the above statement, there are two forms.

Substance form (Real value) = RM 20,000

Legal form (Value in documents) = RM 2,000

Therefore, documenting transactions of RM 2,000 will result in a breach of the accounting principle known as content over form. As a result, the transaction recording needs to be corrected and it must be done at a genuine value of RM 20,000 instead of the incorrect number.

So, Michael Sdn Bhd needs to record the transaction as follows:

The debit impact of the transaction is recorded for the plot purchased. The second credit is cash paid for the purchase plot. However, the market value of the plot is RM 20,000. So a balance of RM 18,000 (20,000 – 2000) is a balancing figure, which will be the value of the production technique sold to TT Sdn Bhd

The crucial accounting practice is to prioritize content above form. It indicates that the financial statement should reflect the transaction’s actual form. This idea contributes to the financial statement’s increased dependability. Additionally, it aims to improve the financial statement’s accuracy and fairness.


All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.

The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

8 views0 comments


bottom of page